Project
| ID | INDIGO-POJ-0153 |
|---|---|
| Impact Bond Name - (Value) | HMP Peterborough (The One Service) |
| Stage of Development - (Value) | Complete |
| Dates - Date outcomes contract signed - (Value) | 2010-03 |
| Dates - Start date of service provision - (Value) | 2010-09 |
| Dates - (Source ID's) | source4,source3 |
| Overall project finance - Total investment commitment - Currency - (Value) | GBP |
| Overall project finance - Total investment commitment - Amount - Exact - (Value) | 5000000 |
| Overall project finance - Total investment commitment - Amount USD - Exact - (Value) | 7725833.703 |
| Purpose and classifications - Intervention - (Value) | The Peterborough SIB is intended to reduce the reconviction rates of short-sentence male prisoners leaving HMP Peterborough. The One Service contracted four organisations, St. Giles Trust, Ormiston Children and Families Trust, YMCA and SOVA, to deliver its core activities. St. Giles Trust and Ormiston Children and Families Trust focus on the immediate needs of an o ender and his family before and after he is released from prison. These needs include accommodation, medical services, family support, employment and training, bene ts and nancial advice.Participants voluntarily refer themselves into 'The One Service'. St Giles Trust workers interviewed offenders to assess their needs. supported offenders before release, at the point of release, and into the community. The Ormiston Children and Families Trust supported offender's children and families in that time. SOVA and YMCA provided longer-term, lower-intensity support. |
| Purpose and classifications - Policy sector - (Value) | Criminal justice |
| Purpose and classifications - (Source ID's) | source1 |
| Service and beneficiaries - Target population - (Value) | Adult males (aged 18 or over) who received custodial sentences of less than 12 months and who had been discharged from HMP Peterborough |
| Service and beneficiaries - Actual number of unique service users or beneficiaries engaged (total) - (Value) | 1802 |
| Service and beneficiaries - (Source ID's) | source11 |
| Notes - (Value) | It has been reported that there were 17 investors in total. Additional assessment: QinetiQ and the University of Leicester appointed as Independent Assessor, created a comparison group using Propensity Score Matching. Intervention cohort matched against up to ten individuals in a control group. |
| Delivery Locations 1: Location - Name - (Value) | Peterborough City Council |
| Delivery Locations 1: Location - Country - (Value) | GB |
| Delivery Locations 1: Lat/Lng - Lat - (Value) | 52.588227 |
| Delivery Locations 1: Lat/Lng - Lng - (Value) | -0.264768 |
| Sources 1: Id | source1 |
| Sources 1: Name - (Value) | Peterborough Social Impact Bond: Final Report on Cohort 1 Analysis (QinetiQ, University of Leicester, 2014) page 5 |
| Sources 2: Id | source2 |
| Sources 2: Name - (Value) | Jake Anders, Richard Dorset, HMP Peterborough Social Impact Bond - cohort 2 and final cohort impact evaluation (National Institute of Economic and Social Research, 2017), page 3 |
| Sources 3: Id | source3 |
| Sources 3: Name - (Value) | Peterborough Social Impact Bond: Final Report on Cohort 1 Analysis (QinetiQ, University of Leicester, 2014) page 7 |
| Sources 4: Id | source4 |
| Sources 4: Name - (Value) | Peterborough Social Impact Bond: an independent assessment - Development of the PSM methodology (QinetiQ, University of Leicester, 2012), page i |
| Sources 5: Id | source5 |
| Sources 5: Name - (Value) | Reducing Reoffending Among Short Sentenced Male Offenders from Peterborough Prison (Social Finance, 2011), page 9 |
| Sources 6: Id | source6 |
| Sources 6: Name - (Value) | Charity Commission, 'Find Charities' <http://apps.charitycommission.gov.uk/showcharity/registerofcharities/RegisterHomePage.aspx> [accessed 11/07/19] |
| Sources 7: Id | source7 |
| Sources 7: Name - (Value) | Lessons learned from the planning and early implementation of the Social Impact Bond at HMP Peterborough (RAND, MOJ, 2011), page 3 |
| Sources 8: Id | source8 |
| Sources 8: Name - (Value) | Alex Nicholls, Emma Tomkinson, The Peterborough Pilot Social Impact Bond (University of Oxford, 2013), page 13 |
| Sources 9: Id | source9 |
| Sources 9: Name - (Value) | Barrow Cadbury Charitable Trust Esmee Fairbanirn Foundation Friends Provident Foundation The Henry Smith Charity Johansson Family Foundation TheMonument Trust LankellyChasse Foundation Panahpur Charitable Trust The Tudor Trust Paul Hamlyn Foundation |
| Sources 10: Id | source10 |
| Sources 10: Name - (Value) | Reducing Reoffending Among Short Sentenced Male Offenders from Peterborough Prison (Social Finance, 2011), page 7 |
| Sources 11: Id | source11 |
| Sources 11: Name - (Value) | Alex Nicholls, Emma Tomkinson, The Peterborough Pilot Social Impact Bond (University of Oxford, 2013), page 14 |
| Sources 12: Id | source12 |
| Sources 12: Name - (Value) | Jake Anders, Richard Dorset, HMP Peterborough Social Impact Bond - cohort 2 and final cohort impact evaluation (National Institute of Economic and Social Research, 2017), page 14 |
| Sources 13: Id | source13 |
| Sources 13: Name - (Value) | Alex Nicholls, Emma Tomkinson, The Peterborough Pilot Social Impact Bond (University of Oxford, 2013), pages 12-13 |
| Sources 14: Id | source14 |
| Sources 14: Name - (Value) | Phase 2 report from the payment by results Social Impact Bond pilot at HMP Peterborough (Ministry of Justice, 2014), pages 11-12 |
| Sources 15: Id | source15 |
| Sources 15: Name - (Value) | Alex Nicholls, Emma Tomkinson, The Peterborough Pilot Social Impact Bond (University of Oxford, 2013), page 15 |
| Sources 16: Id | source16 |
| Sources 16: Name - (Value) | Jake Anders, Richard Dorset, HMP Peterborough Social Impact Bond - cohort 2 and final cohort impact evaluation (National Institute of Economic and Social Research, 2017), page 1 |
| Sources 17: Id | source17 |
| Sources 17: Name - (Value) | Peterborough Social Impact Bond: an independent assessment - Development of the PSM methodology (QinetiQ, University of Leicester, 2012), pages 1-2 |
| Service Provisions 1: Id | serviceprovision1 |
| Service Provisions 1: Organisation ID - (Value) | INDIGO-ORG-0630 |
| Service Provisions 2: Id | serviceprovision2 |
| Service Provisions 2: Organisation ID - (Value) | INDIGO-ORG-0631 |
| Service Provisions 3: Id | serviceprovision3 |
| Service Provisions 3: Organisation ID - (Value) | INDIGO-ORG-0170 |
| Service Provisions 4: Id | serviceprovision4 |
| Service Provisions 4: Organisation ID - (Value) | INDIGO-ORG-0633 |
| Outcome Payment Commitments 1: Organisation ID - (Value) | INDIGO-ORG-0005 |
| Outcome Payment Commitments 2: Organisation ID - (Value) | INDIGO-ORG-0306 |
| Investments 1: Id | investment1 |
| Investments 1: Organisation ID - (Value) | INDIGO-ORG-0266 |
| Investments 2: Id | investment2 |
| Investments 2: Organisation ID - (Value) | INDIGO-ORG-0268 |
| Investments 3: Id | investment3 |
| Investments 3: Organisation ID - (Value) | INDIGO-ORG-0636 |
| Investments 4: Id | investment4 |
| Investments 4: Organisation ID - (Value) | INDIGO-ORG-0637 |
| Investments 5: Id | investment5 |
| Investments 5: Organisation ID - (Value) | INDIGO-ORG-0638 |
| Investments 6: Id | investment6 |
| Investments 6: Organisation ID - (Value) | INDIGO-ORG-0639 |
| Investments 7: Id | investment7 |
| Investments 7: Organisation ID - (Value) | INDIGO-ORG-0640 |
| Investments 8: Id | investment8 |
| Investments 8: Organisation ID - (Value) | INDIGO-ORG-0641 |
| Investments 9: Id | investment9 |
| Investments 9: Organisation ID - (Value) | INDIGO-ORG-0271 |
| Investments 10: Id | investment10 |
| Investments 10: Organisation ID - (Value) | INDIGO-ORG-0642 |
| Intermediary services 1: Organisation ID - (Value) | INDIGO-ORG-0063 |
| Outcome Metrics 1: Id | outcomemetric1 |
| Outcome Metrics 1: Outcome Definition - (Value) | Reduced reoffending (1). A 10% reduction in the number of reconviction events in any of three cohorts of 1000 prisoners. Matched comparison group; evidence of re-convinction events held on the police national computer. |
| Outcome Metrics 1: Primary SDG goal - (Value) | 16 |
| Outcome Metrics 1: Primary SDG target - (Value) | 16.3 |
| Outcome Metrics 1: Secondary SDG targets - (Value) | 16.1 |
| Outcome Metrics 2: Id | outcomemetric2 |
| Outcome Metrics 2: Outcome Definition - (Value) | Reduced reoffending (2). A 7.5% reduction in the number of reconviction events across all three cohorts of 1000 prisoners. |
| Outcome Metrics 2: Primary SDG goal - (Value) | 16 |
| Outcome Metrics 2: Primary SDG target - (Value) | 16.3 |
| Outcome Metrics 2: Secondary SDG targets - (Value) | 16.1 |
| Results 1: Outcome Metric Id - (Value) | outcomemetric1 |
| Results 1: Number engaged In impact bond - (Value) | 1802 |