Assessment Resource

IDINDIGO-ARES-0076
Assessment Resource - StatusPUBLIC
Assessment Resource - NameQualitative Impact Assessment Protocol (QuIP)
Assessment Resource - Who? - Public SectorYES
Assessment Resource - Who? - Private SectorNO
Assessment Resource - Who? - Third SectorYES
Assessment Resource - Output Format - AgnosticNO
Assessment Resource - Output Format - Monetary ValuationNO
Assessment Resource - Output Format - Non-monetary quant indexNO
Assessment Resource - Output Format - OrdinalNO
Assessment Resource - Output Format - Qualitative onlyYES
Assessment Resource - Output Format - Quant but no indexNO
Assessment Resource - Time frame? - OngoingNO
Assessment Resource - Time frame? - ProspectiveNO
Assessment Resource - Time frame? - RetrospectiveYES
Assessment Resource - Scale? - AgnosticNO
Assessment Resource - Scale? - MicroYES
Assessment Resource - Scale? - MesoNO
Assessment Resource - Scale? - MacroNO
Assessment Resource - Impact Goal - AgnosticYES
Assessment Resource - Impact Goal - DefenceYES
Assessment Resource - Impact Goal - DemocracyYES
Assessment Resource - Impact Goal - Development/ Poverty ReductionYES
Assessment Resource - Impact Goal - EducationYES
Assessment Resource - Impact Goal - Employment/ Financial well-beingYES
Assessment Resource - Impact Goal - HealthYES
Assessment Resource - Impact Goal - HousingYES
Assessment Resource - Impact Goal - Local rejuvenationYES
Assessment Resource - Impact Goal - SDG orientedYES
Assessment Resource - Impact Goal - Social impactYES
Assessment Resource - Impact Goal - Sustainability/ EcoYES
Assessment Resource - Impact Goal - Well-beingYES
Assessment Resource - Type - Case StudyNO
Assessment Resource - Type - ClassificationNO
Assessment Resource - Type - ConsultancyNO
Assessment Resource - Type - FrameworkYES
Assessment Resource - Type - GuideNO
Assessment Resource - Type - DatasetNO
Assessment Resource - Type - PrinciplesNO
Assessment Resource - Type - Reporting StandardsNO
Assessment Resource - Type - Resource Repository or SummaryNO
Assessment Resource - Type - ToolNO
Assessment Resource - Type - Training ProgrammeNO
Assessment Resource - Sourcing? - AgnosticNO
Assessment Resource - Sourcing? - Outsource to VendorNO
Assessment Resource - Sourcing? - Paid toolNO
Assessment Resource - Sourcing? - Proprietary in-houseNO
Assessment Resource - Sourcing? - Self-drivenYES
Assessment Resource - Method? - AttributionNO
Assessment Resource - Method? - Diff-in-Diff statistical analysisNO
Assessment Resource - Method? - Ex-ante projectionsNO
Assessment Resource - Method? - Focus GroupsYES
Assessment Resource - Method? - Framework agnosticNO
Assessment Resource - Method? - InterviewsYES
Assessment Resource - Method? - Mission AlignmentNO
Assessment Resource - Method? - ObservationNO
Assessment Resource - Method? - Operational DataNO
Assessment Resource - Method? - RCTsNO
Assessment Resource - Method? - SurveysYES
Assessment Resource - Method? - Theory of ChangeYES
Assessment Resource - Method? - Before and AfterNO
Assessment Resource - Used in sectors? - CharityYES
Assessment Resource - Used in sectors? - CSRNO
Assessment Resource - Used in sectors? - DevelopmentNO
Assessment Resource - Used in sectors? - Governance/ PolicyYES
Assessment Resource - Used in sectors? - Green BookNO
Assessment Resource - Used in sectors? - HealthcareNO
Assessment Resource - Used in sectors? - HousingNO
Assessment Resource - Used in sectors? - IGOsNO
Assessment Resource - Used in sectors? - Impact investingNO
Assessment Resource - Used in sectors? - MicrofinanceNO
Assessment Resource - Used in sectors? - SIBsNO
Assessment Resource - Used in sectors? - Social EnterprisesNO
Assessment Resource - Used in sectors? - Sustainability/ EcoNO
Assessment Resource - Used in sectors? - Developed CountriesYES
Assessment Resource - Used in sectors? - Developing CountriesNO
Assessment Resource - Internal / External? - InternalYES
Assessment Resource - Internal / External? - ExternalNO
Assessment Resource - LeaderUniversity of Bath’s Centre for Development Studies (CDS) and Bath SDR
Assessment Resource - PurposeThe Qualitative Impact Assessment Protocol (QuIP) is an impact evaluation approach that draws on Contribution Analysis. QuIP studies serve to provide an independent reality check of a predetermined theory of change which helps stakeholders to assess, learn from, and demonstrate the social impact of their work. QuIP’s approach places project beneficiaries’ voices at the centre of the evaluation, enabling them to share and feedback their experiences in an open, credible, and respectful way.
Assessment Resource - ContentThe QuIP gathers evidence of a project’s impact through narrative causal statements collected directly from intended project beneficiaries. Respondents are asked to talk about the main changes in their lives over a pre-defined recall period and prompted to share what they perceive to be the main drivers of these changes, and to whom or what they attribute any change - which may well be from multiple sources. A control group is not required as evidence of attribution is sought through respondents’ own accounts of causal mechanisms linking X to Y alongside Z (key informant attribution) rather than by relying on statistical inference based on variable exposure to X. This narrative data is intended to be triangulated with other data and to complement quantitative evidence on changes in X, Y and Z obtained through routine project monitoring or other methods.
Assessment Resource - Linkhttps://www.betterevaluation.org/en/plan/approach/QUIP#:~:text=The%20Qualitative%20Impact%20Assessment%20Protocol,social%20impact%20of%20their%20work.